CREATING A PROPOSAL


I. TECHNICAL/REQUIRED FORMAT

Back  Next
 
The technical section should include information on the experiment the team is proposing. The points awarded to this section by the reviewers is worth 70% of the overall total score; therefore, this section should include any information that a technical reviewer might find informative or instructive in understanding the aims and goals of the experiment. Evaluators ranking the proposal for its scientific merit will read only this section, so teams should be sure to address all relevant factors as listed below.
 
Section Format Required Additional Information
COVER PAGE
(Page 1)
  • title of the experiment
  • topic area addressed
  • team name
  • team logo (optional)
  • academic institution name/address
  • designated student team contact name, e-mail address and phone number
  • faculty supervisor name, e-mail address and phone number
  • each team member's name, role (flyer, alternate flyer, ground crew), academic year (freshman, sophomore, junior, senior), academic major, and e-mail address. Previous program participants should be designated with an asterisk (*) and crew/program date listed
  • Faculty advisor's / signature required at bottom
  • team contact must be a student team member
  • SAMPLE:
    *MacPherson, Jennifer (macpher@hotmail.com).
    Flyer / Sophomore / Electrical Engr / AUG99 (alt flyer)
  • The statement at the bottom of the cover page indicates that the team's faculty advisor endorses the proposal being submitted. Additionally, the Faculty Advisor Statement is required in the administrative section of the proposal.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Page 2)
  • Table of Contents should reflect the arrangement of the proposal with sections clearly noted
  • pages should be numbered
 
FLIGHT WEEK
PREFERENCE
  • Include team's top three preferences for flight dates.
 
ADVISOR/
MENTOR REQUEST
  • Occasionally, teams request the services of a JSC scientist or engineer to augment the guidance given by faculty members and/or the Student Flight Program staff. If teams want to request a JSC scientist or engineer as a mentor for their group, they can do so in their proposal.
 
SYNOPSIS/ABSTRACT
  • a brief (up to 300 words) summary that touches upon the elements of the research being proposed
 
TEST OBJECTIVES
  • a description of the team's objectives in conducting the experiment proposed
    • describe the aim of the experiment being flown
    • mention whether or not the experiment is a follow-up to a previous experiment
    • state hypothesis
 
TEST DESCRIPTION A brief, but detailed, description of the test being proposed. It should be written so that a practicing engineer or scientist can understand the experiment. Goals should be presented along with a description of the expected results.
  • Expected or actual results for accompanying ground-based experiments should also be presented here. Describe the quantitative/qualitative data to be collected and how it will be analyzed.
  • What does the team expect to learn as a result of the experiment?
  • Exactly how will the test be conducted?
  • Describe the quantitative/ qualitative data to be collected and how it will be analyzed.
  • Why is a reduced gravity environment necessary for this experiment?
Note on free-floating experiments:
  • No more than 2 free-floating experiments will be accepted for each flight week.

 

JUSTIFICATION FOR FOLLOW-UP FLIGHT
  • Brief summary (less than 300 words) of any previous related experiment flown as part of the RGSFOP which is directly related to the experiment being proposed. (A Phase II or Part II experiment)
  • Include information regarding any continuation, modification, or expansion of the previously flown experiment and justification for its re-flight.
  • Clearly justify the need for re-flying the experiment.
  • What were the previous results? What was the conclusion?
  • Proposals for follow-up flights which do not include the justification summary will not be considered.
REFERENCES/
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Standard MLA format
  • Referenced works should be cited in the text of the proposal and in a "Bibliography."
  • Do not include Web sites.
  • References must be relevant! Prefereably one-half of references should come from research journals
  • SAMPLE:
    Howell, John R. Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, McGraw-Hill, 1992.
    Example of how the technical portion of your proposal will be EVALUATED
 
Back  Next
 
NASA - Logo